Preventive Structure Philosophy Framework

This tool provides step-by-step guidance for "thinking that prevents risks in advance"
and supports your long-term perspective as a tangible, interactive philosophy.

Please note that the steps and criteria presented here are merely examples.
Feel free to add, remove, or modify them according to your purpose and situation to adapt them to your specifications.

Preventive Structure Philosophy – Judgment Criteria Framework

A system that emphasizes your reason, ethics, and long-term perspective to prevent risks

⚠ This framework is a template.
Please add, delete, and edit steps to suit your context and values.
Modifications are free within the scope of the MIT license.
Step 1 / 11
Are you maintaining your reason?
Are you trying to make important decisions while fatigued, stressed, or in an emotional state?
Are you in a state where you can make calm and objective judgments?

If NO, recommended actions:

We recommend eating, sleeping, and resting. Also, taking time and distance is important.
Is it ethical?
Is the action or judgment you are considering morally correct?
Are there any problems such as harming the public?
Is that ethics local or universal?
Are your judgment criteria not limited to a specific culture or era?
For example, is there a balance between deontological ethics (rule-focused) and utilitarian ethics (result-focused)?
Is it something that should be done ideally, even if currently impossible?
Even if it's difficult to realize, is it something of value that should ideally be executed?
Or is it something that is impossible and "should not be done"?
Do you understand the cognitive limitations we have as humans and their impact?
Human cognition has limitations such as biases, assumptions, and information constraints.
Do you understand these and take them into consideration when making decisions?
Are you avoiding "fights" you cannot win?
Are you trying to engage in battles with no chance of winning?
Like Sun Tzu's Art of War, are you strategically choosing situations where you can win?
After winning, have you avoided "winning too much" and cornering your opponent?
Victory is important, but completely cornering your opponent can invite dangerous retaliation.
Are you not creating a situation like "a cornered rat will bite a cat" by hurting your opponent's face or position?
Can you distinguish between doing nothing and observing quietly versus missing opportunities?
Can you appropriately judge when to act and when to wait?
Can you avoid bureaucratization due to the purpose becoming the means, or action paralysis?
Are you prepared for historical judgment by intelligent life forms 100 years in the future?
Are you considering how your actions will be evaluated by advanced intelligence in the future?
Do you understand that ethics may become stricter as civilization advances?
Can you contribute to the public and humanity?
Is your action valuable for society as a whole and humanity?
Does it constitute a contribution beyond personal gain?
Can you structure it and entrust it to another person?
Is your work in a form that others can inherit and develop further?
Is it systematized rather than dependent on an individual?

✓ Framework Complete

You have completed all steps of the Preventive Structure Philosophy.
May your choices and decisions be rational and ethical judgments
that consider long-term perspectives and contributions to the public!

Next challenge: Work on solving another problem

⏸️ Pause